Basics
Guides
API Reference
Basics
Guides
API Reference
[46:7] extends: object
The [struct@StaticRWLock] struct represents a read-write lock. A read-write
lock can be used for protecting data that some portions of code only read
from, while others also write. In such situations it is desirable that
several readers can read at once, whereas of course only one writer may write
at a time. Take a look at the following example: |[ GStaticRWLock rwlock =
G_STATIC_RW_LOCK_INIT; GPtrArray *array; gpointer my_array_get (guint index)
{ gpointer retval = NULL; if (!array) return NULL;
g_static_rw_lock_reader_lock (&rwlock); if (index < array->len) retval =
g_ptr_array_index (array, index); g_static_rw_lock_reader_unlock (&rwlock);
return retval; } void my_array_set (guint index, gpointer data) {
g_static_rw_lock_writer_lock (&rwlock); if (!array) array = g_ptr_array_new
(); if (index >= array->len) g_ptr_array_set_size (array, index + 1);
g_ptr_array_index (array, index) = data; g_static_rw_lock_writer_unlock
(&rwlock); } ]| This example shows an array which can be accessed by many
readers (the my_array_get() function) simultaneously, whereas the writers
(the my_array_set() function) will only be allowed once at a time and only
if no readers currently access the array. This is because of the potentially
dangerous resizing of the array. Using these functions is fully multi-thread
safe now. Most of the time, writers should have precedence over readers. That
means, for this implementation, that as soon as a writer wants to lock the
data, no other reader is allowed to lock the data, whereas, of course, the
readers that already have locked the data are allowed to finish their
operation. As soon as the last reader unlocks the data, the writer will lock
it. Even though [struct@StaticRWLock] is not opaque, it should only be used
with the following functions. All of the g_static_rw_lock_* functions can
be used even if [func@Thread.init] has not been called. Then they do nothing,
apart from g_static_rw_lock_*_trylock, which does nothing but returning
true. A read-write lock has a higher overhead than a mutex. For example, both
[method@StaticRWLock.reader_lock] and [method@StaticRWLock.reader_unlock]
have to lock and unlock a [struct@StaticMutex], so it takes at least twice
the time to lock and unlock a [struct@StaticRWLock] that it does to lock and
unlock a [struct@StaticMutex]. So only data structures that are accessed by
multiple readers, and which keep the lock for a considerable time justify a
[struct@StaticRWLock]. The above example most probably would fare better with
a [struct@StaticMutex].
StaticRWLock (Handle = null)
Creates a new
StaticRWLockby wrapping a native handle or another wrapper.
Handle is the native handle or another wrapper whose handle to adopt.toNativeHandle (Source)
Normalizes a constructor argument into a raw pointer carrier. Accepts a raw NativeHandle, a raw NativeBuffer returned from
fn.call(...), another generated wrapper exposinghandle(), or null. Returns null when the argument carries no pointer.
Source is the raw handle, raw buffer, wrapper, or null.A raw pointer carrier or null when no pointer is present.getLib ()
Returns the opened native library for this generated wrapper.
The opened native library.handle ()
Returns the wrapped NativeHandle.
The wrapped NativeHandle.isNull ()
Returns true when the wrapped handle is null.
A bool.describe ()
Returns a small string for debugging generated wrappers.
A string.
Aussom
Write once. Embed everywhere.
Copyright 2026 Austin Lehman. All rights reserved.